Monday, 30 May 2016

Donald Trump And His Conspiracy Theories

12 Fringe Conspiracy Theories Embraced By A Man Who Might Be The Next President

 
CREDIT: SCREENSHOT
You can find conspiracy theorists on street corners, call-in radio shows and social media.
Soon, you might be able to find one in the Oval Office.
Generally, presidential candidates tend to shy away from conspiracy theories. They involve a mixture of paranoia and gullibility that seems ill-suited for someone seeking access to America’s nuclear codes.
But Donald Trump is a different kind of candidate. He has embraced a wide range of fringe conspiracy theories.
Nevertheless, Republicans are rallying to his side and polls show him reasonably competitive with likely Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton.
Here are the views of a man who might be the next president.

Asbestos is really safe

There are mountains of scientific evidence that asbestos is extremely dangerous to humans. It causes cancer and kills more than 12,000 people every year.
Trump, however, considers the substance a safe and effective fire retardant.

Sunday, 29 May 2016

MONSANTO LOSES MAJOR PCBS POISONING LAWSUIT, FORCED TO PAY $46 MILLION TO VICTIMS



BY CLAIRE BERNISH AT THEANTIMEDIA.ORG


\St. Louis, Missouri — Three plaintiffs have been awarded $17.5 million in damages caused by Monsanto and three other companies for negligence in the production of PCBs.


A jury voting 10-2 in St. Louis found Monsanto, Pfizer, Solutia, and Pharmacia must pay the plaintiffs and assessed an additional $29 million in punitive damages against Monsanto for its continued selling of polychlorinated biphenyls, or PCBs, after the compound had been banned, the St. Louis Post-Dispatch reported. Plaintiffs in this case — three of nearly 100 involved in litigation, some of whom died — said they developed non-Hodgkin lymphoma from exposure to PCBs.


“All of us could pretty much agree that Monsanto was negligent,” said juror Nathan Nevius in the Post-Dispatch.


Ashley Enochs, a second juror, noted, “I think it goes to show that large companies can put stuff out there that’s harmful and they can do it for a long time but that justice is going to be served whether it’s a year after the products are put out, or in this case, 80 years.”


Used in food packaging, paints, and to insulate electronics, among other things, PCBs were manufactured exclusively by Monsanto from 1935 through 1977 and were banned by the Environmental Protection Agency in 1979 after being linked to cancer and birth defects in lab animals — but they also can adversely affect humans’ skin and livers,EcoWatch notes.


According to the lawsuit, Monsanto knew about the dangers of PCBs but continued to sell the product even after the government ban — while maintaining they were safe to the public. PCBs are particularly insidious as they persist in the environment for long periods of time. EcoWatch cited the emergence of internal company documents showing Monsanto knew about problems caused by PCBs long before the ban.


“We know Aroclors [PCBs] are toxic but the actual limit has not been precisely defined,” stated one document, dated September 20, 1955, EcoWatch reported.


Victories in litigation over PCBs have not been met with much success. A Los Angeles jury denied claims of non-Hodgkin lymphoma from exposure, and in July, a different jury in St. Louis County failed to find Monsanto liable for deaths and injuries plaintiffs claimed were caused by PCBs. Over the past three decades a voluminous number oflawsuits against Monsanto over the compound, cited by ThinkProgress, haven’t been successful in holding the now-agrichemical giant responsible for its chemical past. Eight cities — Long Beach, Portland,Seattle, Berkeley, Spokane,San Diego, San Jose, and Oakland — now have pending litigation against Monsanto over PCBs.


“This is the future,” plaintiff’s attorney Steven Kherkher told EcoWatch, explaining his law firm had to ‘pool resources’ to initiate the lawsuit. “The only reason why this victory is rare is because no one has had the money to fight Monsanto.”However, he added, mentioning his firm has around 1,000 plaintiffs surrounding PCBs, “It’s not going to be rare anymore.”


Kherkher also explained as more cases against the company come to court, “every judge allows us to acquire more and more information from Monsanto and discover their documents. There is a lot more information out there yet to be mined.”


Though many remain unaware of the harm caused by PCBs — partly due to the fact the ban is now decades old, and until recently, the compound hasn’t made headlines — as Kherkher explained, it is an ubiquitous substance:


“A lot of people just don’t know that … Monsanto’s PCBs are in the orange juice you drank this morning and the pizza you’ll eat tonight. The air that you’re breathing has PCBs in it. Monsanto has discounted it, saying it’s only parts per billion or parts per trillion, but it adds up.”


Monsanto issued a callous but typical statement about the jury’s findings, which said, “We have deep sympathy for the plaintiffs but we are disappointed by the jury’s decision and plan to immediately appeal today’s ruling […]


“Previous juries in four straight similar trials rejected similar claims by attorneys that those plaintiffs contracted non-Hodgkin lymphoma as a result of eating food containing PCBs. The evidence simply does not support today’s verdict, including the fact that scientists say more than 90 percent of non-Hodgkin lymphoma cases have no known cause.”


Monsanto recently rejected a bid for buyout from Bayer, though the company said it was open to continued negotiations.





SHARE THIS ARTICLE...

Thursday, 26 May 2016

We Could Have Abolished Slavery 100 Years Ago

Stealing America and the great divide

crackedflag
Slavery might have been abolished over a hundred years ago, but there is a new and subtle slavery that has taken over America.
If you’re not in the 1 percent, you’re likely feeling this great divide.
It’s wage slavery.
And no sector is feeling it more right now than blue collar workers. These were the real Middle Class in America, not the fringe. Manufacturing and construction… real “industry” jobs employed generations of Americans and helped build the strongest economy on Earth.
But those jobs and wages started to disappear when we transitioned from a maker economy to a financially-leveraged service economy in the 1970s.
Even what’s left of the manufacturing economy wallows in diminished wages and has pushed most of the jobs overseas. Yes, when the goods come back, they’re cheap, but this process has stolen the earnings power and any shot at wealth for the U.S. Middle Class worker.
Here’s a quote from a white paper out of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s publication Economic Policy Review from 1995 entitled, U.S. Wage Trends in the 1980s: The Role of International Factors by Robert Z. Lawrence:
“…trade (or globalization) helps explain the growing inequality in U.S. wages. In particular, they point to the correlation between rising wage inequality and the growing U.S. trade deficit (Murphy and Welch 1992; Borjas and Ramey 1993). Many argue that trade with developing countries is putting downward pressure on relative wages…”
That was 20 years ago, and things have not gotten better. Both skilled and unskilled jobs are taken up — and encouraged by the government to be taken up — by cheap immigrant labor here at home. In many cases, these jobs are still simply shipped abroad. Either way, the effect noted above has worsened, and American wages for the Middle Class have dropped like a stone.
The “buy American” slogan you might remember from years ago would have helped reverse this. That same Fed paper says, “…had American workers chosen to consume the products they produced, their real compensation would have increased by about 10 percent over the 1980s…” And wages surely would have increased more from there.
Instead, we buy from China and Bangladesh and our addiction to cheap goods and labor has meant the death of the blue collar worker — and the Middle Class — in the U.S.
To see how wage slavery pushes more and more wealth (profits) to the 1 percent, all you have to do is recall that corporations are beholden to shareholders, not workers. And the shareholders are Wall Street bankers, not workers.
According to CNBC, less than 50 percent of Americans are invested in the stock market. And that includes mutual funds in their retirement plans.
On the other hand, most industry figures put institutional influence in the stock market at more than 90 percent.
That means less than 50 percent of individual investors make up less than the 10 percent of the stock activity in the stock market.
That is a humbling reality. It means that institutional investors are running the show and they skim profits from market moves (up and down) that toss individual investors around and from hedging their massive positions.
It’s a tough game for individuals.
I remember once working with a famous options trader doing analysis for their trading service. He was a major player at the Chicago Board Options Exchange and would travel to various countries to help them set up options trading exchanges.
He would send over the trades and we would send it to our subscribers. But what we realized was, the traders on the floor were used to institutional orders of 100-plus options contracts at a time. We had individual subscribers buying one or two contracts with limit orders.
Floor traders told us that the orders were a nuisance and they would run the prices up or down to blow out these small trades and then get back to their “real” trading. Needless to say, the service wasn’t as successful as we had hoped.
It opened my eyes to the fact that try as we might, individual investors are swimming upstream in a very rigged game; if I can be allowed to mix a metaphor.
What that means for you is that it’s becoming apparent that our entire economy is now part of that game the institutions are playing.
And to bring it full circle, the effect is that we no longer control the means of production.
Let that sink in.
That means if China or Vietnam or Taiwan decides they aren’t shipping products that U.S. engineers have designed, there’s nothing we can do. And we can’t simply ramp up domestic production because it doesn’t exist.
And what manufacturing we have left is mired in recession. Jobs are still leaving in search of lower priced labor to help pad the pockets of the wealthy stockholders.
According to the Financial Times, the U.S. service sector now makes up at least 84 percent of the U.S. economy. That is an astounding number. And very few of these jobs are long-term middle-class lifestyle-building jobs. Unless you think going from sales associate to an assistant store manager at Walmart or Lowe’s is going to get your kids through college.
We constantly hear horror stories of computers becoming smart enough that they decide humans are irrelevant. But the fact is, the real horror story is already happening. Corporations own the government and have forced people back to subsistence to keep them from looking beyond their difficult individual circumstances.
We have a lost generation of builders and tinkerers and industrial engineers. It’s all been outsourced. My first house had a decent size basement workshop. My neighbor told me the original owner built a small airplane in the workshop.
How many people do you know who still have a workshop in their garage or basement? Most garages are a microcosm of what I am taking about; they’re filled with the junk we’ve all bought, and nothing we’ve made.
Coders and network engineers are great, but America was built by Americans, not contracted out. And computers aren’t going to overrun humans, but greedy companies and their political shills will. Technology is an easy solution for the 1 percent because they don’t need people, just goods and services. They don’t care where the labor is or where profits are kept, as long as they are getting paid.
And the only way to change things is to vote… with your investments. Vote for politicians that care about helping their constituents, not themselves. They are supposed to be representatives, not “workers.” It’s not a job. If they don’t represent us, we vote them out and start over.
Also, invest in companies that invest in America, not hide profits overseas. Stay out of the reach of the banks as much as possible and limit your debt. Keep gold and silver as a hedge on worthless paper currencies.
It’s time to start to act individually and not count on the “help” of our new masters.
— GS Early

Checking California Police Records



The truth is that your living in such a huge world.

Source: SportsInsider

 Hence, it seems impossible to know everyone around you. However, in the advent of time, some ideas were made by various states to help the public fix such concern. One of the given solutions is to make California Police Records available to all.

In the state of California, obtaining this information is pretty much simple. By means of mail or walk-in, just make a request for this type of report and addressed it to the City of San Diego. Along with your written request is the required admin fee that you must pay. Before addressing this concern to the proper department, it is necessary that you gather relevant information first. That may include the details about the involved parties, the time and place of occurrence, and the report number, if known.

It is the San Diego County Sheriffs Licensing Division that you must contact if you would like to get a police clearance letter. Basically, this document will confirm that youre not involved in any criminal activities in the past. That is why various employers can also take advantage of this information especially in times of making a very crucial decision as to who, among the many job applicants, should be hired. Apart from that, it also helps in choosing the best employee to promote.

There are a lot of reasons why its now essential to search for this information. On top of these reasons is for security. You wouldn't be totally safe with other people unless you have already gathered many details about them. Unfortunately, numerous individuals keep a lot of deep, dark secrets this time. 

That is why before you let them in your life, you must guard yourself all the time. That way, your not only protecting yourself and your family, but the entire community as well.
Searching for these files at your local police station can be inconvenient and time-consuming. But dont fret yet because thats not the only option that you have right now. With the availability of the Internet, retrieving this information has already been made easier. It even houses various court records that contain those decisions that were made by the courts themselves.

Thus, if theres someone who acts suspiciously in your surroundings, then you better start doing a Police Records search now. To make the process easy, make sure that you can provide some relevant details about the person that your searching for. That may include the individuals full name, and state or county of residence. And since they are made for public consumption, anyone holds the right to obtain them for any purposes.


Monday, 23 May 2016

No Free Will You Say? What Nonsense!

bathroom symbols

“What has been is what will be, and what has been done is what will be done, and there is nothing new under the sun. Is there a thing of which it is said, ‘See, this is new’? It has been already in the ages before us.” Ecclesiastes 1:9-10 (ESV)

Without anyone taking notice, change agents distort key words in our language. This blurs, diminishes and distorts our thinking process to the great advantage of unseen authority. This process is so gradual as to be imperceptible.
Out of it evolves very sophisticated control, the purpose of which is plunder.
When our words are manipulated, our thoughts are manipulated into false realities and illusions. Consequently, our competitiveness and survival instincts are reduced in favor of dependence on government authority. We have seen in one generation the masculine neutered and the feminine reduced and the rise and mainstream promotion of the concept of “gender nonconforming.” Gender nonconforming was neither a mainstream phrase nor concept a generation ago.
Most people were not aware, because it was done gradually, that erasing traditional sexual norms began a number of years ago.  The subtle, almost imperceptible move includes the substitution of the word “gender” – a grammatical term – for the word sex – a biological term – as a distinguishing descriptor for male or female.
The effect is to program the mind. When one suffers from anorexia, she (odds are it’s a female) looks in the mirror and sees herself as fat. It doesn’t matter what reality is; whether she is normal weight or rail thin. That person creates an alternate reality in her mind. Anorexia is a mental disorder. One seeking to help that person shrug off this false sense of self would not reinforce that unreality by telling her she is fat. Rather, one would help her seek treatment for it so she could begin to recognize she is not fat and is destroying her health.
Likewise, one who looks in the mirror and sees himself or herself as opposite of his or her biological sex is creating an alternate reality. It is a mental disorder and should not be coddled or reinforced. Nor should anyone else be forced into accepting that person’s alternate reality as reality.
Lo and behold, in its June 2016 issue, the magazine The Atlantic reprises an old “study” and tells us that a concept once only considered in scientific circles is coming mainstream.
That concept is that there is no free will. The human brain is merely a chemical machine only subject to impulses or “neuron-firing” over which man has no control any more than he can control his heartbeat.
The 2002 study involved separating people into two groups and having one group read a passage telling them their actions will have no consequences and the other read a passage that is neutral on the topic of morality. After watching the first group behave immorally and unethically in a series of actions – for instance, taking more money from an envelope than they were instructed to take – researchers determined they had made some great discovery: When there are no consequences for their actions some people will do most anything.
This plays right into the hands of the moral relativists and secular humanists driving society today. If one cannot control his impulses – if there is no free will – then he cannot be held responsible for his actions and face their consequences. Ergo there are no consequences so man can do anything that pleases him.
This humanist philosophy – the notion that man is his own god and arbiter of what is right – is form of universalism. Universalism is socialism, communism and democracy in the political sphere.
Universalism trumpets perfect freedom… while resulting in total slavery. Universalism leads to superstitious and even barbaric beliefs and practices.
Once this philosophy takes hold, sodomite marriage, bigamy, polyamory, pedophilia and bestiality all become acceptable and the new “normal.” What was sin and perversion yesterday is now not only state-sanctioned but state-promoted.
The natural progression then is that they become codified into law.
These perversions are currently practiced in cultures in which normal, healthful God-sanctioned relations between men and women are obliterated by pagan religions (e.g., Islam, Satanism, secular humanism). They are anathema to the Christian family as established by God: one man and one woman married for life, with children.
Of course, the God-centered man recognizes the idea that there is no free will as nonsense. A compassionate God would not create a man who could not control his actions and then judge him for those actions.
The God-centered man recognizes a supreme authority who will judge all actions and that as a result of that judgment that there are consequences to those actions. So free will is God-given.
By erasing the notion of free will, the power elite seek to erase the notion of God. It’s part and parcel of their ongoing effort to force out and suppress – through intimidation and oppression – Christian beliefs in favor of the new secular system.
That’s because the Christian is an individualist and cannot consider himself part of the state collective. The Christian sees himself as a servant of God, not the state.

Politically correct = No free will

Those who propagate this system are the ones who would monopolize all power and wealth. They are always very careful to establish their governments as popular fronts. Sometimes they call them democracy, sometimes communism. People who pay no attention to words and semantics see them all as the same.
The word political means the total aggrandizement of the state. This means that if one is “politically correct” – the goal of notions like “gender nonconforming,” “non-binary” and “no free will” – then his every breath and utterance is toward the aggrandizement of the state or the government. We practice political correctness, and become its perfect agents.
Even most organized churches, when incorporated, are political corporations created for a political purpose, and that is the aggrandizement of the state and the political order. Under these churches we become “politically correct” but spiritually wrong.
The push to relieve you of any responsibility so that you will surrender whatever is asked of you — even your life — to the state is the foundation of the new secular system. It is supreme and total deception. It is completion of the tower of Babel. It is the conclusion and finished man without the spirit of Christ.
The politically correct man wants the external authority of government instead of the spirit and mind of Christ. However the Christian’s total allegiance is to the Living God. He will not sacrifice himself for the body politic.
Thus, he cannot be manipulated by the secularists because he knows that human liberty is of God, not a privilege of the state.

Sunday, 22 May 2016

Should We Tax The Rich FKs More?

If you make good money you already pay 50% in taxes. 

Why should the government get more of your money? So they can line their pockets, give it to their friends or waste it like they do most of the money they get.

 Not like the greedy politicians are any better then the greedy corporations. People who make lots of money sacrifice other things like time with family and their own health. Government shouldn't be able to take half of what you make. 

Top 10% pay like 70+% of taxes, how is that not enough? It's easy to pick on the rich because there's always more poor people then rich people. 

When's the last time you got a job from a poor person?

Nancy Saunders said: No. I'm taxed enough already, and I guess I would fit your description of rich FK. 

I make close to 7 figures, but I get taxed 60% of it in income taxes.

I have to pay malpractice as a doctor, etc. etc. I work for money, so why should the government have the right to take close to all of it. 

What they should do is decrease the salaries of public servants, decrease welfare spending ('cause I pay for that too) and tell those who don't have jobs to get into the workforce and find something to do, etc.

Oh yeah.  says Larry Phischman, I actually don't think the government should allow super rich people to exist.

 We should have a household/family wealth cap of $10 million, after which a person/family's income tax rate goes up to 100%. $10 million is enough for several lifetimes, and allowing people to accumulate more wealth than that slows down the velocity of money, like a blood clot. 

The role of wealthy financiers and venture capitalists can be filled by government grants and crowd funding.
· What do you think?

Can You Describe Obama In Just ONE Word?

Describing Obama in One Word?

What can you say about his Resume in the last 7 years. Just a few more months and he's History, time to flip the page..

I’ve made it no secret that I simply don’t understand why so many people have such negative feelings toward President Obama. While I’ll be the first to admit that he hasn’t been perfect, considering the circumstances he inherited and has had to deal with since becoming president, I think he’s done a damn good job. 

I usually attribute it to three things: People forgetting just how bad things were when he was elected. People had unrealistic expectations as to what he could actually do. The conservative media has done a great job at filling our society with such false information about him that most people can’t decipher fact from fiction. So I thought I’d try to clear the air of some of the false information about the president and list 10 reasons why I’m thankful that Barack Obama is our Commander-in-Chief. 

1. Because we’ve had continuous private-sector job growth every single month since March of 2010, creating well over 10 million jobs. 

2. Nearly six years into his presidency he hasn’t started any new wars, despite the fact that it would have been very easy for him to have done so several times by now. 

3. Since he signed the Affordable Care Act into law, millions of Americans have gained health insurance who wouldn’t have been able to without it. 

4. We avoided another Great Depression due in large part to the stimulus he passed in 2009 that stopped the economy from spiraling even further out of control. 

5. Despite all that he’s had to fix following the catastrophic Bush presidency, he’s still managed to reduce our deficits by over $1 trillion since he was elected. 

6. No matter what propaganda Republicans try to perpetuate about him, the truth is he’s outperformed Reagan on jobs, growth and investing. 

7. LGBT rights have progressed further during his administration than under any other president in United States history, with proud gay Americans now serving their country without the fear of being kicked out of the military for their sexual orientation. 

8. During his presidency we’ve not only seen a rebound of our stock market, but stocks have broken multiple records. 

9. We saved the American auto industry, killed Osama bin Ladin and removed chemical weapons from Syria without firing a single shot. 

10. Our unemployment rate is below 6% for the first time since before the economic crash of 2008. In fact, we’ve seen the fastest drop in unemployment in 30 years. 

And while there are many other reasons why I’m glad he’s our president, I’ll end it there. Like I said, I know he’s far from perfect, but considering the circumstance he inherited and the blatant Republican obstruction he’s had to deal with, I think he’s done a damn good job.

What do you think?



Did Justin Trudeau FK UP Canada ?

 He's young and will make a few mistakes, Some say.

 Why don't you wait and see what he does over the next few years? You can't really get rid of him until the next election, so why bother being so negative all the time? Evaluate his skills and his legacy in 2020 and vote based on that.

Most people in Canada in the past 2-3 decades have been voting not for the best party. Instead they place strategic votes to try and keep some OTHER party from getting elected. That's why (in my opinion) the Canadian election system is broken and needs to be changed.

Personally I like the preference based voting. You list the candidates in order of 1st choice, 2nd choice, etc and when the ballots are counted, if there was not a clear majority from the first choices, they include the second choice until the candidate for the riding has a 50% + 1 majority.

I doubt this will ever change in my lifetime. But dare to dream, right?

He has done no worse than Harper. Lets see what he does after 4-5 years.

What do you think?

SHARE THIS ARTICLE

American Suicide Is At 30 year High

U.S. SUICIDE RATE SURGES TO A 30-YEAR HIGH 

 

SOURCE: NEW YORK TIMES

WASHINGTON — Suicide in the United States has surged to the highest levels in nearly 30 years, a federal data analysis has found, with increases in every age group except older adults. The rise was particularly steep for women. It was also substantial among middle-aged Americans, sending a signal of deep anguish from a group whose suicide rates had been stable or falling since the 1950s.

The suicide rate for middle-aged women, ages 45 to 64, jumped by 63 percent over the period of the study, while it rose by 43 percent for men in that age range, the sharpest increase for males of any age. The overall suicide rate rose by 24 percent from 1999 to 2014, according to the National Center for Health Statistics, which released the studyon Friday.
The increases were so widespread that they lifted the nation’s suicide rate to 13 per 100,000 people, the highest since 1986. The rate rose by 2 percent a year starting in 2006, double the annual rise in the earlier period of the study. In all, 42,773 people died from suicide in 2014, compared with 29,199 in 1999.

“It’s really stunning to see such a large increase in suicide rates affecting virtually every age group,” said Katherine Hempstead, senior adviser for health care at the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, who has identified a link between suicides in middle age and rising rates of distress about jobs and personal finances.

Researchers also found an alarming increase among girls 10 to 14, whose suicide rate, while still very low, had tripled. The number of girls who killed themselves rose to 150 in 2014 from 50 in 1999. “This one certainly jumped out,” said Sally Curtin, a statistician at the center and an author of the report.

READ MORE....

SHARE THIS ARTICLE...

Friday, 20 May 2016

Marijuana’s Long Term Effects On The Brain Finally Revealed


With a drug war against marijuana still raging in more countries than not, the question of how long-term marijuana use effects the human brain is a pivotal question in its legalization.  Although alcohol remains legal despite heaps of evidence to the dangers of long-term use, the fight to make marijuana available both with regard to its medical properties(especially in selectively killing cancer cells) and non-medical uses has frequently hinged on the various claims made about marijuana’s effects on the recreational user.
Luckily, the debate can finally move out from the realm of opinion into scientific evidence as researchers from the University of Texas just published their research into the long-term effects of marijuana use on the brain in PNAS (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences).
The researcher helped dispel the dying myth that marijuana use lowers IQ, and actually provides more evidence to marijuana’s potential role in fighting Alzheimer’s. The research revealed that earlier onset of regular marijuana use leads to greater structural and functional connectivity in the brain. The most significant increases in connectivity appear as an individual begins using marijuana, with results showing that the severity of use is directly correlated to greater connectivity.
Although these results will need to be confirmed with a larger sample (this was based on roughly 100 participants), the preliminary results seemed promising. More research needed to be done in order to see if these differences are caused by, or simply associated with, long term marijuana use. The UT study also found reduced gray matter in the OFC (orbitofrontalcortex) in long-term users (which is a brain region associated with addiction). It was unclear whether this region is simply smaller in regular users (explaining their regular use) or if the use actually contributed to structural brain changes.

A more recent follow-up study (yes, we edit articles with new information) published in the Journal of Neuroscience, also with 100 people (50 adolescents and 50 adults) found no significant differences in brain structure relating to daily or non-daily cannabis consumption. Which pokes holes in the interpretation that cannabis consumption was the driver in the gray matter differences seen in University of Texas study.
These results will also need to be viewed in light of other researcher showing that cannabinoids actually promote brain cell growth/regrowth (neurogenesis) even in adults. Why this could possibly remain illegal anywhere, is an important question, and hopefully people will continue to inform themselves and others on the topic.

posted by Michael Thomas 

Thursday, 19 May 2016

Homeschooling Your Kids And you Will Go To Prison

PARENTS NOW BEING THROWN IN JAIL IN AMERICA FOR HOMESCHOOLING THEIR CHILDREN



homeschooling
America the police state has become a labyrinth of rules, regulations and mandates, the amount of which is impossible to know, let alone comply with. But you know, that ol’ “ignorance of the law is no excuse” excuse wielded by faceless, un-elected bureaucrats wins out every time against the hapless, helpless citizen. In fact, some Americans cynically believe that rules are nearly impossible to comply with, and that they are written that way on purpose so as to justify the size, scope and power of the state.
That’s what seems to be the case in Ohio, whose Republican governor, John Kasich, wants to be the next president of the United States. His state’s department of education is so stringently absurd, that for lack of a piece of paper, it seeks to jail parents who dare to homeschool their kids.
As reported by Off The Grid News, two separate households that homeschool their children are facing jail time and thousands of dollars in fines and fees, for just barely missing state deadlines that they knew nothing about.
The charges are as ridiculous as the filings – “contributing to the delinquency of a minor,” despite the fact that state nannies acknowledged the children were indeed being schooled at home, in parental education programs that officials later acknowledged met the state’s requirements.
The state school system says that the parents did not provide them with proper, timely notification that their kids would not be attending publicschool [a requirement that only a totalitarian could love]. But in contemptuous fashion, rather than notifying the parents of their delinquent paperwork filing, education officials let the children’s’ absences from public school mount up for nearly a month, so that they could bring criminal charges against them, according to Peter Kamakawiwoole of the Home School Legal Defense Association (HSLDA).
Guilty of … missing paperwork
Job justification, you see. Now watch – don’t be surprised if the next step is for the state to step in and remove the children from the homes of these “criminals.”
Most of the time around the country, the lawyer said, “if the family resolves the issue promptly, state officials rarely pursue further action—like criminal prosecution—against the parents. Unless you happen to live in Ohio.”
Kamakawiwoole added that both families were relatively new tohomeschooling laws in the Buckeye State.
“One family filed a notice of intent when they began homeschooling last year, but did not know they had to file another notice for this school year,” Kamakawiwoole wrote [and why didn’t the state education nannies tell them they needed to file again?]. “The other family filed their annual notice of intent, but did not submit an educational assessment with their notice because they had not yet completed it, and had been told by their school district that there was no deadline for submitting the assessment.”
So they were given wrong information by school officials, and are now being made to suffer for it.
Kamakawiwoole maintained that the state education officials who are paid by state taxpayers had an obligation to contact the families when absences began to mount.
‘Disproportionate and draconian’
“As soon as both families realized their errors, they took action to comply with their districts’ demands,” he wrote. “After filing the paperwork, both families received a letter from their superintendent verifying that their homeschool program is in compliance with state law for the 2015-2016 school year.”
However, the school district then brought criminal charges – which will carry a maximum of $1,000 in fines, and six months in the county jail, not to mention what kind of lasting effect such a conviction might have on other constitutional rights (like gun ownership).
However, “each day that a child is ‘truant’ can be considered a separate offense,” Kamakawiwoole said, so that means jail time and fines could mount quickly.
“There is no question that homeschooling families have to meet certain filing requirements in Ohio, and this statute’s primary purpose is to deal with parents who ignore their responsibilities to direct the upbringing and education of their children,” Kamakawiwoole wrote. “But that is not what is happening here. When schools use this statute to prosecute families for what amounts to a simple clerical error, the response is disproportionate and draconian.”
Sources: